Your Endorsements Must Be Transparent

October 5, 2009

Today the FTC pub­lished new guide­lines requir­ing adver­tis­ers and mar­keters to be trans­par­ent when using endorse­ments as a mar­ket­ing tac­tic. In a new twist the revised guide­lines also apply to the peo­ple who act as the endorser.

Who Is Affected

The revised FTC guide­lines apply to:

  • celebri­ties who endorse prod­ucts or brands;
  • blog­gers or word-of-mouth brand ambas­sadors who receive a mate­r­ial ben­e­fit from the com­pany (cash or payment-in-kind, such as free products);
  • cus­tomer tes­ti­mo­ni­als (espe­cially when the customer’s expe­ri­ence is atypical);
  • research orga­ni­za­tions – when spon­sored reports are used to help pro­mote the sponsor’s prod­ucts and services.

The dis­clo­sure require­ments apply both to the spon­sor­ing brand or com­pany  as well as the recip­i­ent of the spon­sor­ship: blog­gers, celebri­ties, ana­lysts or research orga­ni­za­tions. The recip­i­ent must dis­close the nature of their rela­tion­ship with the sponsor.

Blog­gers – up to $11K in fines for nondisclosure

When endors­ing or review­ing a prod­uct, blog­gers must dis­close “mate­r­ial con­nec­tions” with the spon­sor­ing brand – or face poten­tial fines up to $11,000. When a blog­ger is paid or given a free copy of a prod­uct in exchange for a prod­uct review, the blog­ger is oblig­ated to dis­close that fact. The new FTC guide­lines define that rela­tion­ship as an endorse­ment; they define “mate­r­ial con­nec­tions” as cash or payments-in-kind, such as gifts of free prod­ucts or services.

Celebri­ties tweet­ing or tout­ing a brand on talk shows must reveal that their designer apparel, jew­elry, or fancy sports car were free gifts from the company.

Affects B2B mar­ket­ing too

Although intended as a means of pro­tect­ing Amer­i­can con­sumers, these guide­lines will also apply to B2B mar­keters who rely on endorse­ments and tes­ti­mo­nial tac­tics. For exam­ple, there’s a long-standing tra­di­tion of webi­nars, white papers and ana­lyst reports that are used as endorse­ments, and paid for the spon­sor­ing com­pany. B2B mar­keters do not always reveal that the endorser’s ser­vices have been paid for… Those prac­tices will now need to undergo new scrutiny.

There’s no doubt that these new guide­lines will be dif­fi­cult to enforce; how­ever, they will demand a new set of pro­fes­sional stan­dards – a code of ethics – for blog­gers whose post­ings are spon­sored by third par­ties. That will help all of us apply the right con­text to our inter­pre­ta­tions of the prod­uct and ser­vice reviews we read online.

Per­sonal Dis­clo­sure – And a Promise

I’m happy to report that my posts are not spon­sored by any third par­ties. In the future if a com­pany pays me to review a prod­uct, or gives me a free copy in exchange for this ser­vice, I promise to reveal that fact.

Unlike blog­gers who blog for a liv­ing (such as peo­ple on salaries who write for their employer), I’m not paid when I blog. My con­sult­ing firm does not pay me to write this blog. Hav­ing said that, I hope the blog reflects favor­ably on the firm.

Print Friendly

Previous post:

Next post: