If you’re a B2B mar­keter, you’re no doubt suf­fer­ing through the painful con­se­quences of buy­ers tak­ing con­trol of the pur­chas­ing process. You’re under attack from all fronts, your bud­gets are dwin­dling. Con­stant con­flicts with sales col­leagues. And just to add to the pres­sure, the suits in the C-suite demand proof (fact-based evi­dence) of how much your mar­ket­ing efforts con­tribute each quar­ter to rev­enues and margins.

Mean­while you’re bar­raged with com­pet­ing claims from tech ven­dors promis­ing mir­a­cle solu­tions, if only you’d invest in their tech­nol­ogy or ser­vices for:

  • lead nur­tur­ing, rev­enue per­for­mance man­age­ment, demand gen
  • con­tent marketing
  • social con­ver­sa­tions
  • com­mu­nity engagement
  • rep­u­ta­tion mon­i­tor­ing, social media monitoring
  • brand sto­ry­telling
  • trans­me­dia strategies

The list of alleged sil­ver bul­lets goes on and on… What’s a mar­keter to do? Where’s a smart place to start, to invest your pre­cious time, atten­tion and budget?

Mas­ter­ing the Buyer’s Journey

To drive improved rev­enue per­for­mance means pro­vid­ing buy­ers with what they need, when they want it, in their pre­ferred chan­nels. That means you must respond to what they need, based on how they make buy­ing deci­sions. As B2B mar­ket­ing expert Ardath Albee writes, you need to:

Be found with the right infor­ma­tion in the chan­nels buy­ers prefer.

How Online Pub­lish­ing Changes the Game, Ardath Albee

What B2B buy­ers strongly pre­fer is infor­ma­tion that’s spe­cific to their job roles, rel­e­vant to their indus­try or mar­ket­place. It takes insight-driven mar­ket­ing to respond appro­pri­ately: to know how to posi­tion the value of your offer­ing in ways that are mean­ing­ful to your buy­ers, to sup­port the busi­ness case they will even­tu­ally have to construct.

You can’t arrive at insight-driven mar­ket­ing by just sit­ting in a con­fer­ence room, hud­dled around a white­board. Despite the pres­sures to act now, act fast, you need to invest in some buyer-centric research. You need insights into each stage of the buyer’s jour­ney, across the life­cy­cle of their engage­ment with your com­pany — and that means under­stand­ing what they expect and need from you long after the sale has been made.

As Apple’s Steve Jobs famously said:

The jour­ney is the reward.

— Steve Jobs

So here’s my ver­sion of Steve Jobs’ advice, adapted for B2B marketers:

Mas­ter­ing the buyer’s jour­ney leads to the reward.

Chris­tine Thomp­son and other B2B mar­ket­ing strategists

If you’re being hon­est, how well do you under­stand who your buy­ers are, the roles they play within their com­pa­nies, the pains that moti­vate them to find a bet­ter way, the fac­tors they’ll use to eval­u­ate options and busi­ness cases? In my expe­ri­ence as a con­sul­tant, few B2B com­pa­nies really under­stand how cus­tomers make buy­ing deci­sions due to the tra­di­tional myopic focus on the sales process.

If you haven’t fig­ured out how to gain these buyer-centric insights, I rec­om­mend the white paper writ­ten by Ardath Albee of Mar­ket­ing Inter­ac­tions, How Online Pub­lish­ing Changes the Game, spon­sored by Hoovers. Albee’s paper pro­vides a thought­ful overview of how B2B mar­keters need to up their game: by cen­ter­ing all activ­i­ties (includ­ing con­tent mar­ket­ing) on the buyer’s jour­ney rather than remain­ing mired in tac­tics dri­ven solely by the sales process. Accord­ing to Albee, it all starts with the right insights into the buyer per­sonas. Her paper offers both con­cep­tual advice as well as use­ful tips on where to focus first.

There are mul­ti­ple ways to get started: such as LinkedIn research, syn­di­cated research, ask­ing prob­ing ques­tions of your sales­peo­ple — and talk­ing directly to cus­tomers to learn what mat­ters to them. Con­sul­tants can help…

Painful Con­se­quences of the Sta­tus Quo for B2B Marketers

Accord­ing to a recent report by For­rester, here are some of the typ­i­cal con­se­quences of tra­di­tional B2B mar­ket­ing, approaches that haven’t responded to the new realities:

  • Only 12% of tech mar­keters say they have a “very strong” rela­tion­ship with their sales coun­ter­parts when it comes to achiev­ing align­ment on sales pipelines, processes for man­ag­ing leads, etc.
  • Half are unable to reach solid agree­ment on basic things like busi­ness targets.
  • No vis­i­bil­ity into what’s going on with the buyer (or buyer com­mit­tee) once the lead moves into the sales pipeline.
  • Chaotic engage­ment with the cus­tomer, siloed com­mu­ni­ca­tion chan­nels, incon­sis­tent mes­sages, lost opportunities.
  • Too many tools, too lit­tle inte­gra­tion, too much over­lap, wasted spend.

Automat­ing Lead to Rev­enue Man­age­ment, by Lori Wizdo, For­rester Research, Decem­ber 9, 2011.

If you don’t take action to “mas­ter the buyer’s jour­ney” and respond appro­pri­ately, your com­pany is liable to suf­fer missed fore­casts, dis­ap­point­ing quar­terly results, angry share­hold­ers, diluted brand equity — not to men­tion on-going hos­til­ity between sales and marketing.

Net net: The more you fail to meet buy­ers’ and cus­tomers’ expec­ta­tions, the more your busi­ness will decline. If your busi­ness con­tin­ues to decline, your job is likely to be at risk. So act now — take steps to under­stand the buyer’s journey.

Print Friendly

{ 0 comments }

Apple announced new tools to cre­ate and view iBooks on the iPad, and a new dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nel for dig­i­tal text­books. In doing so Apple ignited a firestorm of debate on the sub­ject of dig­i­tal books, and the future of the pub­lish­ing indus­try, book dis­tri­b­u­tion, and likely con­sumer con­sump­tion pat­terns. More impor­tantly, they set the stage for what we will some­day rec­og­nize as a new medium, a new form of con­tent in its own right.

And mean­while Apple is doing so at a time when the pub­lish­ing indus­try is at risk, with out­moded busi­ness mod­els, under attack on mul­ti­ple fronts.

More Than Just Textbooks

Apple posi­tioned their Jan­u­ary 19 announce­ment as an edu­ca­tion event, with the aim of rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing the text­book pub­lish­ing indus­try. Accord­ing to the Wall Street Jour­nal, only 6% of text­books are deliv­ered today in dig­i­tal form, fore­casted to reach 50% by 2020. That’s a big tar­get in its own right, but I’d guess Apple’s unspo­ken aspi­ra­tions are even broader…

Well beyond what we think of as “books”

Years from now, we’ll look back at this moment and real­ize that Apple lit a fire, fuel­ing a new medium, one still to be named.

What Apple has in mind is not just a book or a text­book ren­dered dig­i­tally on an iPad. Their vision for this new type of con­tent goes well beyond dig­i­tal books, enhanced ebooks, or what­ever labels we use today.

Their vision mashes up ele­ments of movies, games, ani­ma­tions and dynamic mod­els, inter­ac­tiv­ity,  hyper­link­ing and non­lin­ear nav­i­ga­tion — key enhance­ments to the core ele­ments of sto­ry­telling, nar­ra­tive flow, design, lay­out, etc. Here are some of the core ele­ments that will drive our under­stand­ing of this new medium, as I see it.

Beyond the Book

— Source, Chris­tine Thomp­son, Inform­ing Arts ©2012

Text­books First, But Not Last

I sus­pect Apple chose the text­book as the ini­tial tar­get for rein­ven­tion because the lim­i­ta­tions of a print-based medium for multi-dimensional, com­plex or time-sensitive sub­jects are so well under­stood. Apple’s long expe­ri­ence at sell­ing to and sup­port­ing edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tions affords the com­pany unique insights into what works, and what’s bro­ken, when it comes to 21st cen­tury education.

The text­book pub­lish­ing indus­try is huge, and can help finance the tri­als that will even­tu­ally shape the win­ning char­ac­ter­is­tics of this new emerg­ing medium. In North Amer­ica alone the tra­di­tional text­book pub­lish­ing indus­try gen­er­ates $12–14 bil­lion annu­ally, accord­ing to one expert (for a more con­ser­v­a­tive assump­tion: > $4 bil­lion in 2011 text­book sales, accord­ing to the WSJ today; $8 bil­lion in 2010 accord­ing to For­rester. Clearly no one agrees on the def­i­n­i­tion of the indus­try, but it’s huge.)

From Apple’s per­spec­tive (as a mas­ter of dis­rup­tive inno­va­tions), the edu­ca­tional pub­lish­ing indus­try must be a sit­ting duck, ripe for transformation.

“We are edu­cat­ing peo­ple today in the same way as we did when there was 1% as much knowledge.”

– Danny Hillis, The Econ­o­mist, March 22, 2001

That said Apple is will­ing to be a part­ner, not just a dis­rupter. Apple announced that it plans to part­ner with edu­ca­tors and pub­lish­ers (reported by the Wall Street Jour­nal today). When this part­ner­ship is pro­duc­tive, those who embrace change and can envi­sion a new medium should profit enormously.

This New Medium Requires New Tal­ents & Specialties

What will emerge is a new form of multi-faceted con­tent. This new medium will require con­tri­bu­tions from many spe­cial­ties, such as:

  • Pho­tog­ra­phers, video­g­ra­phers, musi­cians, producers
  • Design­ers, illus­tra­tors, animators
  • Art/creative direc­tors for the ensem­ble as a whole
  • Game devel­op­ers — peo­ple who know how to incor­po­rate game mechan­ics (“gam­i­fi­ca­tion”) within designed experiences
  • User expe­ri­ence and inter­ac­tion designers
  • Usabil­ity testers
  • Web devel­op­ers and pro­duc­ers (HTML5 and CSS3 experts), scripters and coders
  • Infor­ma­tion archi­tects, tax­on­omy and tag­ging specialists

And of course, the usual:

  • Writ­ers and copy­writ­ers (as well as trans­la­tors for books with global appeal)
  • Edi­tors
  • Fact check­ers
  • Tal­ent spot­ters (acqui­si­tion experts)

On the strate­gic level this new medium will require vision­ar­ies, risk tak­ing pio­neers, game chang­ers and oth­ers whose per­son­al­i­ties are prob­a­bly abhor­rent to the tra­di­tional pub­lish­ing world.

Not to men­tion new mod­els for brand build­ing, social media inter­ac­tions with con­sumers, and new forms of mar­ket­ing. But that’s a whole dif­fer­ent sub­ject in its own right.

[Dis­clo­sure: I played a key role in Apple’s early days of dig­i­tal pub­lish­ing, but have had no involve­ment in their cur­rent activ­i­ties. The opin­ions described here are my own, based on inter­pre­ta­tions of what I’ve read and heard over the Web.]

Print Friendly

{ 2 comments }

With more peo­ple access­ing blogs and web­sites from smart­phones, con­tent own­ers need to check out their exist­ing page designs to ensure they are “smart­phone friendly” — opti­mized for mobile usage. By that I mean: usable on a smart­phone with­out requir­ing a mag­ni­fy­ing glass to read or nav­i­gate them. Blogs and web­sites that aren’t just a “min­i­mized ver­sion” of the orig­i­nal content.

mobile-contentYes, peo­ple can use pinch­ing or other fin­ger­tip ges­tures to con­trol scrolling or mag­ni­fi­ca­tion on their phones, but this is less than ideal. Prob­lems abound.

Some nav­i­ga­tion schemes work poorly or not at all for peo­ple with fat fin­gers. Peo­ple with bifo­cals or those over 40 may have trou­ble read­ing tiny type…

Pho­tos or videos intended for view­ing on a lap­top or desk­top PC may down­load slowly, or be dif­fi­cult to see if not opti­mized for mobile viewing.

How Best to Opti­mize Mobile Content?

If you’re a busi­ness or con­tent owner like me, you will need a way to adapt to a grow­ing array of devices with diver­gent require­ments — with­out increas­ing the time you must devote to your blog or web­site. This may not be a press­ing prob­lem today, but when mobile access starts to exceed 50% of your audi­ence, the prob­lem will become urgent.

(If you earn your liv­ing design­ing and devel­op­ing blogs or web­sites for oth­ers, Hal­leluja! You’ve just stum­bled on a new rev­enue stream.)

It’s imprac­ti­cal tackle these mobile opti­miza­tion require­ments on a post-by-post or page-by-page basis. Instead con­tent own­ers need a smarter, more mod­ern tech­ni­cal plat­form to han­dle this for the blog or web­site as a whole. The smart way to tackle web + mobile opti­miza­tion is by using a design strat­egy called “respon­sive web designs.”

Assum­ing you’re not a web devel­oper by trade, you also want a plat­form that han­dles the heavy-lifting for you, with­out requir­ing you to make exten­sive use of hand-coded scripts…

Word­Press Users, Rejoice

If you use Word­Press to man­age your blog or web­site, there’s a new tool in the off­ing that can sim­plify your adop­tion of a respon­sive web design strat­egy. Check out Head­way Themes. (Pric­ing ranges from $68 to $378, depend­ing on the options.)

Their upcom­ing release, Head­way 3.0.5, aims to tackle some of the core lay­out chal­lenges: enabling the designer or tech­ni­cally savvy blog­ger to turn fixed-layout designs into flex­i­ble or “respon­sive web lay­outs.” (Read the book Respon­sive Web Design if you want a deeper under­stand­ing of this topic as a whole.)

Head­way experts dis­cuss the new func­tions in a screen­cast here; note that the respon­sive web demo takes place at about the 8-minute mark… (Cau­tion: this video and dis­cus­sion are intended for peo­ple already famil­iar with Headway.)

How Head­way (or Word­Press, for that mat­ter) will sim­plify the task of serv­ing up the opti­mal media for each device is still unclear to me at this point, beyond the fact that it will involve the use of “media queries.”

A Good First Step

Whether or not Head­way has the per­fect solu­tion in Q1 2012, I’m relieved that the Word­Press devel­oper com­mu­nity has begun to tackle some of the chal­lenges pre­sented by rapid adop­tion of mobile web access. Their efforts should even­tu­ally make it eas­ier for con­tent own­ers to adapt con­tent for opti­mal view­ing across a broad gamut of devices.

At present <5% of my blog vis­i­tors arrive here via a smart­phone. This gives me time to exper­i­ment with Word­Press and Head­way (or oth­ers), try dif­fer­ent approaches using an exper­i­men­tal site, and be ready with a solid solu­tion once mobile traf­fic becomes significant.

In the mean­time I look for­ward to some hands-on test­ing to see what’s involved in opti­miz­ing for mobile web visitors.

Print Friendly

{ 0 comments }

I’ve been a fan of the Busi­ness Model Can­vas as a strate­gic enabler for orga­ni­za­tions that seek busi­ness model inno­va­tion, or for entre­pre­neurs who want a sim­ple but pow­er­ful way to describe a new busi­ness con­cept. But as I note below, this approach has not got­ten the atten­tion it deserves within the North­west tech com­mu­nity. Thanks to a forth­com­ing enhance­ment, the Busi­ness Model Can­vas is now poised to become a for­mi­da­ble tool for busi­ness innovators.

Crit­ics point to the Busi­ness Model Can­vas’ light­weight treat­ment of the cen­tral value propo­si­tion — the under­ly­ing ratio­nale that fuels future rev­enues — how and why spe­cific offers will sat­isfy the needs of defined cus­tomer seg­ments. Iron­i­cally, where the can­vas is most weak lies at the epi­cen­ter of what dri­ves entre­pre­neurs to go with­out pay or sleep, mort­gage their homes, and risk their most impor­tant rela­tion­ships in order to build a business.

Enter the Customer-Value Can­vas to address that chal­lenge, as a con­cep­tual “plug-in” for the Busi­ness Model Canvas.

The Busi­ness Model Can­vas itself is based on ground­break­ing work by Alex Oster­walder and Yves Pigneur, with crowd-sourced con­tri­bu­tions from hun­dreds of busi­ness lead­ers. Their approach is described in a delight­fully illus­trated book, Busi­ness Model Gen­er­a­tion, which I highly rec­om­mend. (I also rec­om­mend Osterwalder’s blog.)

Out­side the time– and money-starved tech com­mu­nity, the Busi­ness Model Can­vas has been acclaimed by many forward-thinking busi­nesses. Here’s why.

Busi­ness Model Can­vas Overview

Thumbnail of the Business Model CanvasThe Busi­ness Model Can­vas enables entre­pre­neur­ial teams to col­lab­o­rate on a new busi­ness con­cept that can then be pre­sented on a sin­gle page. The can­vas itself is a 9-box frame­work, encap­su­lat­ing the key dimen­sions of a holis­tic busi­ness model.

Struc­tured Brainstorming

The can­vas pro­vides an effec­tive means to struc­ture col­lab­o­ra­tive think­ing, dis­cus­sion and brain­storm­ing about the most impor­tant aspects of a pro­posed busi­ness model. Via a brain­storm­ing process (online or in-person work­shops), peo­ple cap­ture their ideas using sticky notes that they place within the appro­pri­ate box. Con­strain­ing ideas to sticky notes enforces high-level think­ing… Con­strain­ing those notes to fit within the boxes requires the team to set priorities.

Each box rep­re­sents 1 of the 9 most impor­tant com­po­nents of a holis­tic busi­ness model (e.g., cus­tomer seg­ments). Each note out­lines a sin­gle idea, an aspect of their pro­posed busi­ness con­cept. The team must ensure there’s an inter­nal logic to the model — each sticky note (or idea) must be con­cep­tu­ally linked to other core dri­vers of the busi­ness model.

The 9 Com­po­nents of a Busi­ness Model

Oster­walder and Pigneur, the pro­po­nents of this frame­work, define the 9 most impor­tant aspects of a busi­ness model as:

  • its value proposition
  • cus­tomer seg­ments to be served
  • cus­tomer rela­tion­ships (how the orga­ni­za­tion will inter­act or deal with its customers)
  • the chan­nels to be used
  • the organization’s key activ­i­ties to be performed
  • the key resources to be utilized
  • the part­ners needed to fill in key gaps (e.g., gaps in chan­nels, crit­i­cal activ­i­ties or resources)
  • the cost structure
  • the rev­enue streams to be generated

See Busi­ness Model Gen­er­a­tion for more infor­ma­tion on how “vision­ar­ies, game chang­ers” and entre­pre­neurs are using this approach to envi­sion inno­va­tions that can be designed and then devel­oped into action plans.

Yes, But…” Say Tech Firms

This approach has been proven as an effec­tive inno­va­tion resource, when adopted via facil­i­tated work­shops that bring out the best think­ing of the inno­va­tion team. In fact a world­wide con­sult­ing indus­try has emerged to deliver work­shops and follow-on ser­vices lever­ag­ing the Busi­ness Model Can­vas. (Just search on #bmgen to see the many tweets from prac­ti­tion­ers.) The Euro­pean busi­ness com­mu­nity has been espe­cially enthu­si­as­tic about this approach.

But when propos­ing this frame­work to tech clients here in the Pacific North­west, I often encounter resis­tance due to its light­weight treat­ment of the value propo­si­tion and cus­tomer needs. Clients crit­i­cize its lack of focus on the value prop’s impli­ca­tions for segment-specific product/service offers, or the ratio­nale for those offers.

When this model fails to res­onate with what tech entre­pre­neurs care about most, they often over­look the value of the BM Can­vas as a means to struc­ture or draw out their think­ing in more pro­duc­tive and holis­tic ways.

As a stop­gap I’ve devel­oped some approaches to bridge this con­cep­tual gap; how­ever, that has entailed rough links to cus­tomer devel­op­ment, lean startup and other frame­works for entre­pre­neur­ship and inno­va­tion. Clients find this obvi­ous mash-up of mod­els to be too confusing…

For­tu­nately, the cre­ators of the Busi­ness Model Can­vas have now begun work on a sup­ple­men­tary can­vas that focuses squarely on the customer-value propo­si­tion link­age — the sine qua non of a busi­ness model that can actu­ally cre­ate value for all stakeholders.

Link­ing Customer-Value to the Busi­ness Model Canvas

Alex Oster­walder, one of the core archi­tects of the Busi­ness Model Can­vas, is now pro­to­typ­ing what he calls the “Customer-Value Can­vas.” Call­ing it a “plug-in” to the Busi­ness Model Can­vas, he is test­ing and refin­ing it via client engagements.

This new Customer-Value Can­vas should help inno­va­tors focus atten­tion on what mat­ters most when craft­ing a value propo­si­tion — the key dri­vers that respond directly to the pains and desired gains that sur­round a customer’s unmet needs.

Oster­walder rec­om­mends fram­ing those needs in terms of the jobs-to-be-done, a proven model for less risky inno­va­tion that’s based on research and prac­tice by Harvard’s Clay­ton Chris­tensen, Mark John­son of Innosight and oth­ers. He also rein­forces Steve Blank’s call for real-world, “out of the build­ing” obser­va­tion of cus­tomer needs, rather than bas­ing a busi­ness on what the founders assume to be true.

Here’s the customer-centered com­po­nent of Osterwalder’s Customer-Value Can­vas; this dri­ves focused think­ing on the most impor­tant aspects of the customer’s job-to-be-done, and the pains and gains asso­ci­ated with that cus­tomer “job.”

The Customer-Value Can­vas | Observ­ing the Customer’s Needs

Job-to-be-done mapped to customer segment

Source: The Customer-Value Can­vas cre­ated by Alex Osterwalder

The right-hand side of this can­vas should reflect real-world assump­tions about cus­tomer needs, based on “out-of-the-building” obser­va­tions of what cus­tomers really care about: the jobs they need to per­form in their per­sonal or work life, and the obsta­cles to get­ting those jobs done today. (Read Four Steps to the Epiphany by Steven Blank for more insights into this process.)

It’s dan­ger­ous to base these assump­tions solely on what the founders say is so, no mat­ter how impas­sioned their argument…

Design­ing the Offer to Sat­isfy Those Needs

The left-hand side of the can­vas shows the value propo­si­tion that will be designed in response to the customer’s job-to-be-done. This value prop com­prises the core aspects of a com­pelling offer that will sat­isfy the customer’s needs — the things that will deliver on the customer’s desired gains, and elim­i­nate or neu­tral­ize the pains they con­front today. This is where the entre­pre­neur­ial team should focus its think­ing on the bun­dle of prod­ucts and ser­vices to be delivered.

customer-value-canvas

Source: The Customer-Value Can­vas cre­ated by Alex Osterwalder

The Busi­ness Model Can­vas describes how the com­pany will orga­nize itself to deliver that value propo­si­tion to those cus­tomers, and how it will gen­er­ate prof­its while doing so.

Based on the Best Think­ing about Entrepreneurship

What makes Osterwalder’s pro­posed customer-value model even more pow­er­ful is the way it builds upon some of the best think­ing for 21st cen­tury entrepreneurship:

Adop­tion of the Customer-Value Can­vas should help forward-thinking tech founders and inno­va­tors clar­ify their think­ing about the crit­i­cal ingre­di­ents that power their rev­enue engine. If so, they will be bet­ter equipped to build smarter busi­nesses that are less likely to fail.

Print Friendly

{ 1 comment }

An Android smart­phone entered my life this hol­i­day sea­son, to solve net­work access issues in places where my beloved iPhone can’t con­nect via the AT&T net­work. Like San Fran­cisco and the Sil­i­con Valley…

While the cur­rent gen­er­a­tion of Android smart­phones has improved dra­mat­i­cally, the over­all user expe­ri­ence is sur­pris­ingly uneven — bet­ter suited for con­sumer use cases than the needs of a small busi­ness owner. Here’s my take so far. [click to continue…]

Print Friendly

{ 4 comments }

Revised on January 17, 2012

OMG, It’s a “Transmedia” Problem

December 2, 2011

Yes­ter­day I blogged about an emerg­ing chal­lenge fac­ing small busi­nesses — adapt­ing their web con­tent so it’s more usable and acces­si­ble for peo­ple who use smart­phones or tablets to go online. It’s amaz­ing what you can learn in a day by sim­ply focus­ing your atten­tion on a busi­ness issue. From Jakob Nielsen, the usabil­ity guru, I’ve […]

Print Friendly

2 comments Continue →

Are You Ready for Web + Mobile Content Strategies?

December 1, 2011

If you blog reg­u­larly, how pre­pared are you to respond to the impact of device pro­lif­er­a­tion or the increas­ing num­ber of peo­ple who access your con­tent using mobile devices? I don’t know about you, but I’m start­ing to worry about con­tent com­plex­ity, and the lack of “right sized” tech­nol­ogy solu­tions that are usable and affordable […]

Print Friendly

Continue →

Holiday Gifts in the Post-Steve Era

November 28, 2011

Peo­ple buy­ing hol­i­day gifts from the Apple Store can be con­fi­dent those gifts will reflect Steve Jobs’ unique approach. But what about next year? What impact will Steve’s legacy have on future prod­ucts and services?

Print Friendly

Continue →

iPhone 4S: Buying It for Steve?

October 10, 2011

Pre­orders for Apple’s new iPhone 4S sur­passed a mil­lion units in the first 24 hours, more than 40% higher than Apple’s pre­vi­ous single-day record. This early buy­ing frenzy stands in stark con­trast to ana­lysts’ luke­warm response to the intro­duc­tion of Apple’s lat­est iPhone model. Mean­while online Apple fan clubs and LinkedIn net­works of for­mer Apple employees […]

Print Friendly

Continue →

Remembering Steve

October 6, 2011

Like most for­mer Apple employ­ees I’ve been mourn­ing the pass­ing of Steve Jobs, and reflect­ing on his last­ing impact. The many and pro­found ways in which he shaped employ­ees’ val­ues, behav­iors, crit­i­cal think­ing skills, and approach to inno­va­tion. His impact on the world, inspir­ing prod­ucts and ser­vices that would be embraced (and widely imi­tated) for […]

Print Friendly

Continue →